Get ready to blast off into the world of MX Linux 25, code-named 'Infinity'! This latest release is a real game-changer, offering some exciting new features and a few controversial choices that are sure to spark some lively debates.
First things first, MX Linux 25 is based on Debian 13, which means it's a powerful and reliable operating system right out of the box. But here's where it gets interesting: the new version simplifies some choices while making others more complex.
For instance, MX Linux 25 now comes in seven different download options, all for x86-64 architecture. That means no more 32-bit editions, which might be a bummer for some, but it streamlines the process and ensures you're getting the most up-to-date and powerful version.
However, when it comes to the init system, things get a little trickier. MX Linux has traditionally offered a unique feature: the ability to choose between the controversial systemd and the traditional sysvinit as your init system. But with MX Linux 25, this choice has become a pre-install decision, and once you've made it, you can't easily switch.
So, why the change? Well, it seems MX Linux has decided to simplify the process by offering separate downloads for each init system. This means you get to choose upfront, but it also means you're locked into that decision. It's a bold move, and one that's sure to divide opinions.
And this is the part most people miss: MX Linux 25 still offers the same three desktop environments - the default Xfce, the full-featured KDE Plasma, and the lightweight Fluxbox. But here's the kicker: the KDE flavor is only available with systemd, while the other editions offer both systemd and sysvinit options.
To make matters even more complex, the flagship Xfce edition also comes in an Advanced Hardware Support (AHS) variant, which includes the alternative Liquorix kernel. So, in total, you've got seven different variants to choose from, which we think might be a bit overwhelming for some users.
But wait, there's more! MX Linux 25 also introduces some new features and improvements, such as the ability to enable ZRAM memory compression during installation. This is a great option for machines with limited write capabilities, like those running off USB keys or microSD cards.
The MX installer also has a handy new feature: the ability to replace an existing Linux installation in place. This means you can preserve the contents of your /home directory, keeping your files and settings intact. It's a useful feature, especially since MX Linux doesn't directly support version-to-version upgrades like some other popular distros.
MX 25 also inherits support for a new repository config file format called deb822, which is a nice touch. All three desktops have received some sprucing up, with tweaks to their respective menus and file managers.
But it's MX's configuration of the Xfce desktop that really shines. It offers a vertical panel by default, making the most of widescreen monitors, and includes the Docklike Taskbar plugin, which gives you a Windows Vista-style iconic taskbar. It's a well-thought-out configuration that makes Xfce even more user-friendly.
We put the systemd and sysvinit versions of the Xfce edition to the test, and they performed identically. The only noticeable difference was that the sysvinit variant used about 50MB less RAM at idle, which might be a consideration for those with memory-constrained systems.
We also tested the sysvinit edition on a trusty old Thinkpad W520, and it worked like a charm. However, MX Linux couldn't wake up the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M second GPU, leaving the second display attached to the DisplayPort dark. This is a small issue, but it's worth noting if you rely on multiple displays.
Despite this minor hiccup, we found that MX Linux 25 is a well-rounded and sophisticated operating system. Its Xfce configuration is top-notch, and the inclusion of the improved Nala package manager makes it even more user-friendly.
So, is MX Linux 25 the right choice for you? If you're looking for a Debian-based distro that's easier to install and adjust than Debian itself, and you value the option to avoid systemd, then MX Linux 25 might just be your ticket to the stars.
What do you think? Do you prefer the simplicity of a pre-install decision, or would you rather have the flexibility to switch init systems post-installation? Let us know in the comments!
